Paperclip Labs, Inc. · Open-Source Control Plane for Running Teams of AI Agents
Paperclip is a free, MIT-licensed, self-hosted app that runs agents you already use, such as Claude Code, Codex, Cursor, and OpenClaw, as a company: an org chart, goals, a monthly budget per agent, scheduled heartbeats, approval gates, and a ticketed audit trail. It is for builders running several agents at once who need cost control and oversight rather than another agent.
Best for
Technical founders, builders, and small teams already running several coding or general-purpose agents who want budgets, approvals, and an audit trail around them
Not ideal for
Anyone looking for a single agent to do work directly, non-technical users who want a hosted app with no setup, or developers who want a framework to build new agents in code
Who it's for
Builders, technical founders, and teams running multiple AI agents who need org structure, budgets, and governance around them
Open source (self-hosted)
Free
Note: Paperclip publishes no paid plan; a hosted Paperclip Cloud is waitlist-only. Costs come from the AI subscriptions or API keys your agents use and from any infrastructure you host Paperclip on. Checked on November 11, 2026.
Available models
Paperclip vs. Orca
Orca is a desktop environment for running coding agents side by side in git worktrees with you reviewing diffs; Paperclip organizes agents into a persistent org chart with goals, tickets, budgets, and scheduled heartbeats, and is not limited to coding work.
Paperclip vs. OpenHands
OpenHands ships its own coding agent plus a control center and automations for software work; Paperclip has no agent of its own and focuses on governance (budgets, approvals, audit trails) across many agents and business functions.
Paperclip vs. CrewAI
CrewAI is a framework for building role-based agent crews in code; Paperclip does not build agents but coordinates existing ones, such as Claude Code or Codex, as a governed company.
Paperclip vs. OpenClaw
OpenClaw is a personal agent; Paperclip can hire OpenClaw agents and manage them alongside others. The project describes it this way: if OpenClaw is an employee, Paperclip is the company.
What is Paperclip?
Paperclip is an open-source app for managing teams of AI agents. It organizes agents you already use, such as Claude Code, Codex, or OpenClaw, into an org chart with goals, tickets, budgets, scheduled heartbeats, and approval gates, and records everything they do in an audit trail.
Is Paperclip free and open source?
Yes. Paperclip is MIT-licensed and self-hosted, and no Paperclip account is required for a local install. Your costs are the model subscriptions or API keys your agents use and any server you host it on.
Which agents work with Paperclip?
The docs list adapters for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, Hermes, Pi, Grok, and Kimi Code, with an OpenClaw gateway and generic process and HTTP adapters for custom agents. GitHub Copilot connects as a native harness through the Paperclip Runner, and other assistants such as OpenAI Dot are available as experimental options. Any agent that can receive a heartbeat can be connected.
Is there a hosted cloud version of Paperclip?
Not yet. Paperclip runs on your own machine or server, locally with embedded PostgreSQL or on a VPS with login. The website has a waitlist for a hosted version, and cloud deployments are listed as in progress on the project roadmap.
How do Paperclip's agent budgets work?
Each agent gets a monthly budget. Paperclip tracks costs per agent, task, project, and goal, and pauses an agent automatically when it reaches its limit, so a runaway agent cannot keep spending. Since v2026.1023.0, a budget policy also treats usage it cannot price as being at the limit until the charge is resolved, unless you set that policy to allow unpriced usage.
Do Paperclip agents ask for permission before running commands?
Not by default. Since v2026.1001.0, Paperclip starts Claude, Codex, and OpenCode agents in their full-auto modes, so they do not stop for their own permission prompts unless you configure a restrictive mode for that agent. Paperclip's own controls still apply: board approvals for hires and strategy, budgets, pause and terminate, and the audit log. Set an explicit mode for any agent that needs provider-level approval prompts.

Stably AI
Developers who already use one or more CLI coding agents and want to run and review many of them in parallel without branch conflicts
Free
OpenHands
Developers and platform teams who want an open-source, bring-your-own-model coding agent they can run and automate on their own machines or VMs
FreemiumCrewAI
Orchestrating autonomous agent teams for enterprise tasks
FreemiumEsoteric Labs
Developers who already run several Claude Code or Codex sessions on one project and want them organized into a persistent, addressable team they can attach to and steer from the terminal
FreePaperclip does not build or replace agents; it manages the ones you already use. You set up a company with a mission and goals, hire agents into an org chart with roles and reporting lines, and assign work as tickets. Agents wake up on scheduled heartbeats, pick up their tasks, and delegate up or down the hierarchy, while recurring routines cover repeat work. Every instruction, response, tool call, and decision is recorded in an append-only log attached to the ticket, and you act as the board: you approve new hires and strategy, and you can pause, resume, override, reassign, or terminate any agent. Each agent has a monthly budget, costs are tracked per agent, task, project, and goal, and agents pause automatically when they hit their limit. Adapters cover Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, OpenCode, Hermes, Pi, Grok, and Kimi Code, GitHub Copilot connects as a native harness, and generic process and HTTP adapters connect custom agents, following the project's rule: if it can receive a heartbeat, it can be hired. The September 2026 release (v2026.916.0) moved AI credentials such as Claude and Codex subscriptions and API keys into a Connections store, gave each person their own GitHub identity, and added email inboxes for agents through AgentMail plus experimental chat connectors. Later releases added private tasks and projects, routing agents through your own model gateway (OpenRouter, Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, or a compatible API endpoint), and budgets that hold an agent while its usage cannot be priced, and v2026.1106.0 (November 6, 2026) made the native Paperclip Runner the default for new Claude, Codex, OpenCode, and Pi agents on macOS and Linux. Paperclip runs as a Node.js server and React UI with embedded PostgreSQL on your own machine, or on a server behind Tailscale or a public URL with login. The tradeoffs: there is no hosted version yet (the site has a waitlist, and cloud deployments are listed as in progress on the roadmap); since v2026.1001.0 the agent harnesses default to full auto, so Claude, Codex, and OpenCode skip their own permission prompts unless you set a restrictive mode and Paperclip's approvals and budgets are the main guardrail; it supplies no models, so your agents' subscriptions and API usage are the real cost, and it only adds value if you already run several agents worth coordinating.
New Claude, Codex, OpenCode, and Pi agents now start on the native Paperclip Runner on supported macOS and Linux hosts, with a one-click upgrade for existing Claude and Codex agents. GitHub Copilot joined as a native harness, GitHub repositories attached to projects became skill sources, and agent observability can be sent to Braintrust or any OTLP endpoint. The Pipelines experiment was removed.
Tasks and projects can be marked private and shared with named people and agents. Agents can route through OpenRouter, Amazon Bedrock, Google Gemini, or compatible Responses, Messages, and Chat Completions endpoints. Budgets now hold by default while usage cannot be priced, and the Costs page reports ChatGPT and Claude subscription fees beside API spend.
Unconfigured agents now run without their provider's permission prompts: Claude with approve-all, OpenCode with allow, and Codex with approval and sandbox bypass. Explicitly configured restrictive modes are kept, and Paperclip's own approval decisions still apply. The release also added a guided setup for agents that review GitHub pull requests.
A 503-commit release moved AI runtime credentials (Claude and Codex subscriptions, API keys, shared accounts) into Connections, gave agents dedicated AgentMail inboxes, replaced a shared GitHub token with per-person GitHub identities, and added experimental Slack, Discord, Telegram, Teams, and iMessage chat connectors.
Kimi Code became a first-class adapter, the company skill library now reaches agents at runtime, and onboarding was simplified.
Are you the founder? Claim this listing →