LaunchedEditorial Listing

Latch

Latch (Super Labs Inc.) · Latch: Desktop App That Learns a Recurring Accounting Task From One Recording and Turns It Into a Sidekick

Open Latch

Latch is a desktop app for macOS and Windows that watches an accountant do a recurring task once, narrated, and turns the recording into a "sidekick": a fixed, step-by-step automation that repeats the job in your own tools, on demand or on a schedule, and stops to ask you when something does not match what it was taught. It suits solo and fractional accountants, small firms and in-house finance teams with click-heavy close work such as statement downloads, bank reconciliations and moving actuals into a model.

PricingFreemium
Setupeasy
Runs onDesktop
Open sourceNo
DocsYes
CategoryFinance
AccountingMonth-End CloseReconciliationLearning by DemonstrationScreen RecordingDesktop AppWorkflow AutomationNo-CodeScheduled TasksHuman-in-the-LoopSandboxAudit EvidenceMCPExcelSOC 2Small Business

Best for

Solo and fractional accountants, small accounting firms and in-house finance teams with recurring, click-heavy close tasks that follow the same steps each month, who would rather show the process once than write prompts, rules or code

Not ideal for

Teams that need a documented API, a consistent written position on whether recordings of client financial data can train models, Linux or browser-only setups, or audit log export without paying for the Team plan, and work that changes too much from run to run to be captured in one recording

Who it's for

Solo and fractional accountants, small accounting firms, controllers and in-house finance teams running a recurring month-end close

Capabilities

  • Learn mode: record one screen and your voice while you do a task in your usual tools, with Latch asking clarifying questions about decision criteria and edge cases at natural pauses
  • Sidekick generation from a session, with every step listed for review and a test run that previews changes before the sidekick touches your files or data
  • Per-sidekick permissions: Latch explains why it needs each app and you authorize only those connections and that scope
  • Each sidekick runs in its own sandbox on your machine
  • Deterministic execution: the same steps, order and scope on every run, rather than an agent improvising new actions
  • Exception handling that stops the run, explains the discrepancy in plain language and suggests a course of action for you to confirm; multi-factor prompts at bank portals hand control back to you
  • Remembered decisions, so a sidekick does not ask the same question twice
  • Runs on demand or on a schedule, with every step logged as plain-language micro-actions you can inspect
  • Rules you can state in the recording, such as a three-day matching window, a file naming convention or formulas that must never be overwritten
  • MCP server on every plan (mcp.latch.ai) with setup guides for Claude, ChatGPT, Codex and GitHub Copilot, so an AI assistant can work from your recorded sessions, for example to write an SOP that includes the exceptions you described
  • Multi-recording synthesis on Power and above: combines several people's recordings of the same process into one sidekick and surfaces where they differ
  • Role-based access to see, edit and run sidekicks (Power and above) and audit log export of every run and decision (Team and Enterprise)
  • SSO with Microsoft Entra or Google Workspace, passkeys and 2FA, and team workspaces; the enterprise page adds SAML, on-device scrubbing of sensitive data before upload and an on-premises option by arrangement

Limitations

  • Very new: Latch launched publicly on Product Hunt on November 10, 2026
  • Documentation is thin: docs.latch.ai covers installing on Windows and connecting AI tools over MCP, but there is no help center, API reference or changelog
  • The site lists connections such as Xero, QuickBooks, NetSuite and Google Sheets "and hundreds more" but does not say which apps are driven through an API and which through the screen
  • Latch's documents disagree on model training: the getting-started guide says sessions are never used to train AI, the privacy notice says recorded content may be used to train or fine-tune Latch's and its third-party providers' models, and the customer terms and DPA allow aggregated, anonymized use (the terms with an in-product opt-out)
  • The customer terms say the products are not designed to store Sensitive Data, defined to include financial account information such as bank account numbers, and that customers must not transmit it, which is hard to square with recording bank and ledger work; the enterprise page mentions on-device scrubbing of sensitive data but does not say what it catches or which plans get it
  • A session records one screen at a time, so work spread across two monitors has to be moved onto one, and a finished recording cannot be extended
  • Desktop app for macOS and Windows only, with no Linux, mobile or browser-only option; managed Windows machines may need IT approval to install it
  • No documentation says whether scheduled runs need your computer on and the desktop app running
  • What a credit buys is not published as a fixed number; the run price depends on how many steps a sidekick has
  • Audit log export is limited to Team ($1,499/month) and Enterprise; multi-recording synthesis and role-based access start at Power ($490/month)
  • Fixed, recorded processes suit stable, repeatable work; tasks that change every time still need a person or a more general agent

Use cases

  • Downloading each month's bank and card statements, naming them to the firm's convention and filing them in the right Google Drive folders
  • Reconciling a business checking account by matching the bank statement to ledger cash activity in Xero and writing the result to a Google Sheets workpaper
  • Pulling actuals from Xero into an existing financial model in Google Sheets on a weekly schedule
  • Turning a monthly order report and pricing sheet into grouped, priced QuickBooks invoices, with near-miss customer names sent back for review
  • Reviewing bills, receipts and card charges for service-period cutoff and proposing accruals for approval
  • Rolling forward the month-end close checklist and asking task owners in Slack for missing inputs
  • Asking Claude or ChatGPT, through Latch's MCP server, to turn a recorded process into an SOP a new hire could follow

Our take

Latch takes a sensible approach to a real problem in small finance teams: the hard part of automating close work is rarely the clicking, it is the unwritten rules, and recording someone who explains those rules as they work captures more of them than a prompt or a flowchart would. Keeping each sidekick to fixed steps, a narrow set of permissions and a pause on anything unexpected also matches how accountants want automation to behave, and the MCP server means the same recordings can feed SOPs in Claude or ChatGPT. What a buyer cannot yet see is the evidence. Documentation stops at installation and MCP setup, there is no list of which apps run through APIs rather than the screen and no fixed price per step, and, most importantly for client work, Latch's own documents pull in different directions: the getting-started guide promises sessions never train AI while the privacy notice allows it, and the customer terms tell you not to send bank account numbers through a product whose flagship example is a bank reconciliation. The free plan makes it easy to try on an internal task. For client books, get the data questions answered in writing first.

Who should use it

Solo and fractional accountants and small firms with the same click-heavy close tasks every month across tools like Xero, QuickBooks, Google Sheets and bank portals, who want to hand those steps off without writing prompts or code, and controllers who want a free way to test whether one recorded process can run on its own.

Who should skip it

Firms that need a documented API and integration specs, a clear contract position on recording client bank and financial data, or audit log export below the Team price; teams on Linux or locked-down machines where a screen-recording desktop app is not allowed; and anyone whose tasks vary too much between runs to be captured in a fixed process.

Strengths

  • Teaching by demonstration captures steps, naming rules and judgment calls that a written checklist or prompt tends to miss
  • Deterministic runs with a fixed scope, a test run before the first real one, and a pause-and-explain step on anything unexpected
  • Per-sidekick permissions and a sandbox on your own machine limit what each automation can reach
  • Free plan with 50 monthly credits and no card, and teaching and sidekick generation are free on every plan
  • Failed runs are not billed, per Latch's own description of its pricing
  • MCP server on every plan lets Claude, ChatGPT, Codex or GitHub Copilot work from your recorded processes

Weaknesses

  • Brand-new product with only an install guide and an MCP guide for documentation, and no API reference or changelog
  • Data handling needs scrutiny: recordings are stored in the cloud, Latch's documents disagree on whether they can train models, and the terms bar transmitting bank account numbers
  • Credits are not tied to a published per-step price, so the cost of a given sidekick is hard to predict before you run it
  • Team features such as audit log export sit on the $1,499/month Team plan
  • Unclear which apps it operates through APIs versus the screen, and whether scheduled runs need the desktop app open

Latch pricing

Open

$0

  • 1 user
  • 50 credits a month
  • Self-serve onboarding and community support
  • No credit card required

Solo

$50/month

Billed monthly

  • 1 user
  • 500 credits a month
  • $40/month billed annually ($480/year)
  • Self-serve onboarding and community support

Power

$490/month

Billed monthly

  • Up to 5 users
  • 5,000 pooled credits a month
  • Multi-recording synthesis
  • Role-based access
  • $392/month billed annually ($4,704/year)

Team

$1,499/month

Billed monthly

  • Up to 10 users
  • 20,000 pooled credits a month
  • Multi-recording synthesis and role-based access
  • Audit log export
  • Assisted onboarding and priority support
  • $1,199/month billed annually ($14,388/year)

Enterprise

Custom

  • Custom users and credits
  • Audit log export
  • Dedicated onboarding contact and dedicated support

Free tier limits: Open is free forever for one person, with 50 credits a month and no credit card required.

Note: Teaching Latch and generating sidekicks are free; credits are spent when sidekicks run. Latch says a run is priced by its number of steps and runs that do not succeed are not billed, but no fixed credit cost per step is published. Credits refresh monthly and are pooled across the workspace on Power and Team. Extra credits cost $100 per 1,000. The MCP server is included on every plan. Annual plans save 20% and are paid upfront, and the customer terms say fees are non-refundable.

Technical specs

Modalities

Screen recording, Voice

Where Latch excels

Monthly statement collection

Downloading statements from several bank portals and filing them to a naming rule is repetitive and rule-bound, and Latch hands control back for multi-factor prompts instead of storing sign-in codes.

Updating a financial model with actuals

Latch's own controller recorded a Xero-to-Google Sheets update that took over 200 clicks, and the resulting sidekick now runs it weekly on a schedule.

High-volume invoice preparation

When invoices follow contract pricing rules but customer names do not always match, a sidekick can build the batch and send only the near-misses and unmatched lines to a person.

Capturing a process before a team member leaves

Recording someone doing and explaining a task preserves the edge cases and judgment calls along with the steps, an AI assistant connected over MCP can turn it into a written SOP, and on Power and above several people's recordings can be merged to show where their methods differ.

Latch vs. competitors

Latch vs. Kognitos

Kognitos also runs deterministic finance and banking automations that pause on exceptions and keep a step-by-step journal, but you write the process in plain English and an approved procedure runs on Kognitos's platform; it offers a free workspace, with enterprise pricing based on consumption and quoted by sales. Latch learns the process from a narrated screen recording on your desktop and publishes self-serve plans from free to $1,499 a month.

Latch vs. Fuel Agents

Fuel Agents offers prebuilt finance agents for reconciliation, revenue recognition, payroll matching and reporting, chained into scheduled workflows and sold through a demo and a four-week pilot with Fuel's finance engineers. Latch has no agent library: each sidekick is built from your own recording, and smaller teams can start without a sales process.

Latch vs. IrisGo

IrisGo is also a desktop app that learns a workflow from one demonstration and reruns it on a schedule, but it is a general personal assistant for Windows 11 and Apple Silicon Macs, free during its beta. Latch is aimed at accounting work, with per-sidekick permissions, exception handling and team plans with pooled credits and audit logs.

Latch vs. Claude Cowork

Claude Cowork carries out goals you describe across your files and connected tools, choosing its steps as it goes, and comes with a paid Claude plan. It overlaps with Latch on some spreadsheet and reconciliation tasks, but Latch fixes the steps from a recording so each run repeats the same process within an approved scope. The two can also be combined: Latch's MCP server connects to Claude Desktop, including Cowork, so Claude can work from your recorded processes.

Frequently asked questions

What is Latch?

Latch (latch.ai) is automation software for accountants. You record yourself doing a recurring task in the Latch desktop app, talking it through as you go, and Latch builds a sidekick: a fixed sequence of steps that repeats the task in your own tools on demand or on a schedule, and stops to ask you when it meets an exception or a judgment call.

How much does Latch cost?

Open is free for one user with 50 credits a month and no credit card. Solo is $50 a month ($40 a month billed annually) for one user with 500 credits. Power is $490 a month ($392 annually) for up to 5 users with 5,000 pooled credits, multi-recording synthesis and role-based access. Team is $1,499 a month ($1,199 annually) for up to 10 users with 20,000 pooled credits, assisted onboarding, audit log export and priority support. Enterprise is custom. Extra credits cost $100 per 1,000.

What is a Latch credit?

Credits are what Latch uses when it works for you, mainly when a sidekick runs. Recording sessions and generating sidekicks are free; Latch says it charges per successful run, priced by the number of steps in the sidekick, and does not bill runs that fail. A fixed credit cost per step is not published. Credits refresh monthly and are pooled across the workspace on Power and Team.

Does Latch work on Mac and Windows?

Yes. Latch is a desktop app for macOS and Windows. You create an account at app.latch.ai and download the installer from its downloads page; on a Mac you grant Screen Recording and Microphone permissions the first time, and on a managed Windows machine IT may need to approve the install. No Linux, mobile or browser-only version is offered.

Can I use Latch with Claude or ChatGPT?

Yes, through Latch's MCP server at mcp.latch.ai, which Latch says is included on every plan. Its docs give setup steps for Claude (web, desktop and Claude Code), ChatGPT, Codex and GitHub Copilot in VS Code; Microsoft 365 Copilot is set up with Latch's help. Once connected, your assistant can work from your recorded sessions, for example listing them or writing an SOP from one.

Where do Latch sidekicks run, and what happens to my data?

Latch says each sidekick runs in its own sandbox on your machine, limited to the connections and scope you approve. Recordings of the screen and your narration are stored in Latch's cloud. Latch's documents describe their use differently: the getting-started guide says sessions are never used to train AI, the privacy notice says recorded content may be used to train or fine-tune Latch's and third-party providers' models, and the customer terms allow aggregated, anonymized use that you can opt out of in the product. Latch states it is SOC 2 compliant (its trust center lists SOC 2 Type 1) and encrypts data in transit (TLS 1.2) and at rest (AES-256).

Is a Latch sidekick an AI agent?

Latch says no. AI is used to learn the process from your recording and to explain exceptions, but each sidekick performs the same steps in the same order within the same scope on every run, so it does not improvise new actions. When something does not match what it was taught, it stops, describes the discrepancy and suggests a course of action for you to confirm.

Latch vs Kognitos: what is the difference?

Both build deterministic finance automations that pause for a person on exceptions and keep a step-by-step record. With Kognitos you describe the process in plain English and an approved written procedure is what runs on its platform; it has a free workspace, but enterprise pricing is consumption-based and quoted by sales. With Latch you show the process in a narrated screen recording on your desktop, and its published plans run from free to $1,499 a month.

Integrations & fit

ExcelQuickBooksXeroNetSuiteSage IntacctGoogle SheetsGoogle DriveSlackStripeBill.comRampBrexExpensifyGustoADPSalesforceMaxioMCPClaudeChatGPTCodexGitHub Copilot
Good fit forSolo / individual, Startup / small team, Enterprise
Pricing modelFreemium· Free tier available
See pricing on Latch →

Alternatives to consider

About Latch

Latch replaces the prompt with a demonstration. In the desktop app you start a learning session, pick a screen and microphone, and do one full cycle of the task the way you normally would while explaining the decisions and exceptions out loud; Latch follows the screen, listens to the voiceover and asks clarifying questions at natural pauses. Afterwards it builds a sidekick from the session, lists every step and the reason for each permission it wants, and lets you test it and preview what it would change before the first real run. You authorize only the apps that sidekick needs, and each sidekick runs in its own sandbox on your machine. The company is emphatic that a sidekick is not a free-roaming AI agent: AI is used to learn the process and explain problems, but the sidekick runs the same steps in the same order within the same scope every time, and when it meets something it was not taught (an account in one system but not the other, more than one possible match, a multi-factor prompt at a bank portal) it pauses, explains the problem in plain language, suggests what to do and waits for you. Decisions can be remembered so the same question is not asked twice, and every run leaves a plain-language, step-by-step log. Latch's examples are month-end work: its use-case pages sketch how sidekicks could collect and file statements to a naming rule, run an eight-step bank reconciliation across a bank portal, Xero, Google Sheets and Google Drive, review AP cutoff and accruals, prepare payroll journals and update deferred revenue schedules, and a case study describes a few recorded invoices becoming a sidekick that builds about 150 QuickBooks invoices a month. Recordings also feed a Latch library that AI assistants can query: an MCP server included on every plan connects Claude, ChatGPT, Codex and GitHub Copilot, so you can ask for an SOP or a list of exceptions drawn from what you recorded. Pricing is credit-based: teaching and sidekick generation are free, credits are spent when sidekicks run (the run price depends on its number of steps, and failed runs are not billed), and plans go from a free single-user tier to pooled team plans with multi-recording synthesis, role-based access and audit log export. The tradeoffs come from the same design. Latch is new (it launched publicly on Product Hunt on November 10, 2026), its documentation is limited to an install guide and an MCP guide, and the site does not say which apps are driven through APIs and which through the screen. Recordings capture whatever is on the recorded screen and said aloud and are stored in Latch's cloud, and Latch's documents do not agree on how that content may be used: the getting-started guide says sessions are never used to train AI, while the privacy notice allows training Latch's and third-party providers' models. The customer terms also tell customers not to transmit financial account information such as bank account numbers, which sits awkwardly with bank reconciliation as a flagship example. Firms with client-data obligations should read the terms, privacy notice and DPA, and get the training question answered in writing, before recording live client work.

Updates from Latch

LaunchLatch launches on Product Hunt

Latch launched on Product Hunt with a free plan that needs no credit card, pitching a desktop app that records an accountant doing a task, with voice, screen and clicks, and turns it into a sidekick that repeats the steps and pauses on exceptions.

Are you the founder? Claim this listing →